There’s some legal reasoning — cited by a critic of Swartz’s — that ideologically-motivated acts of public disobedience should be punished more harshly than common criminality, because ideologically-motivated protesters are likely to continue to break what they see as bad laws, whereas those motivated by personal gain may be deterred by punishment. It’s called “special deterrence”.Evidence shows this theory is actually applied, at least the other way: large corporations that have engaged in repeated, systemic, even industrial-scale invasion of privacy, either with the cooperation of users Facebook or not Google, have managed to escape substantial penalties or avoid prosecution of any kind. It’s a similar story in Australia with Telstra being repeatedly guilty of privacy breaches, for which it has only receiving “warnings” and been asked for undertakings.
The Aboriginal Press News Service (APNS) is the international, non-partisan, not-for-profit, grassroots newswire of the Aboriginal News Group (ANG).
We seek to support, educate and unify Indigenous Peoples, Bloggers & Activists covering news information important to Original Peoples, First Nations communities and other ethnic-minorities subjected to discrimination, marginalisation, neoliberalism and genocide.
- "Michael Garrett Blair was a 26-year-old African American man who had been diagnosed as a paranoid..." ow.ly/2NPfLi 51 minutes ago
- US police kill 104 people in August - World Socialist Web Site ow.ly/2NPdBd 1 hour ago
- "SD bildades för 25 år sen. Som reaktion på SD och andra högerextremister växte en antirasistisk..." ow.ly/2NPcmf 1 hour ago
- Political Research Associates | Challenging the Right, Advancing Social Justice ow.ly/BIeL5 1 hour ago
- Hate Map ow.ly/BIeFE 1 hour ago